[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
​AJ Gentile, the Why Files YouTuber and podcaster who presents conspiracy theories and paranormal claims with a fig leaf of skepticism, is suing his ex-manager for the return of nearly $750,000 in commissions taken from brands advertising on his show a single one-year period. Considering that commissions are just a fraction of the earnings moving through that show—20% per the contract Gentile included in his legal complaint—we can start to see just how much money there is in teasing the audience with stories of giants, UFOs, and other Fortean nonsense. 
​Meanwhile, former UAP Task Force leader—and self-proclaimed victim of a werewolf stalker—Jay Stratton posted an excerpt from his forthcoming memoir to Instagram in which the UFO investigator claims that he induced the U.S. government to use a nuclear-powered submarine as bait to lure UFOs for his team to attempt to “capture.”
The plan was as bold as it was straightforward; it was a fishing expedition, and our strategy was built on our educated opinion that UAP were drawn to nuclear energy. Our bait would be a nuclear submarine. Its reactor running hot would create a huge nuclear signature, and it would surface in a preselected area within U.S. waters known for past UAP activity. The goal: exploit a decades-old pattern, draw a UAP in close enough to monitor, track, and if possible, capture or recover.
​I am dumbfounded that the Pentagon would agree to use a nuclear submarine in this way, and that the painfully unevidenced mythology about flying saucers is so widely believed. This stupid exercise was doomed to failure from its conception. You can’t capture a figment of your imagination, and there remains no proof that claims of alien spaceships are anything more than fantasy projected onto anomalous blobs. Even if they did manage to shoot something down, they would never admit that a passing balloon or bird was really the UFO they thought they were hunting. The only outcome they would accept would be evidence of aliens—something eighty years of research has never found. The whole thing presupposes aliens that aren’t there.
 
On the other hand, the necessity of such an experiment to support a “hypothesis” about UFOs’ attraction to nuclear energy (to which: why would aliens with interdimensional warp drives even care?) also proves that the UFO researchers and their government patrons do not have evidence of aliens or crashed saucers to study. If they did, idiotic experiments like these would be superfluous. 
[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
​This weekend, Politico ran a credulous magazine piece on UFOs keyed to the meeting of Avi Loeb’s dubiously legal UAP Scientific Advisory Council, which has not filed the required federal paperwork for a group officially advising the federal government. In the piece, Politico reporter Ilan Greenberg makes the rather ahistorical claim that “there is a growing stream of intriguing chatter from people who had or have higher than top secret clearances who normally would not be expected to indulge in UAP speculation.” But they do—all the time, going back to Harry Truman. His examples are particularly poor, Barack Obama’s comments, not from this year (which caused such a stir) but from 2021, and Marco Rubio’s “interest” in UFOs, which he had before he ever entered government. That’s not a “growing stream,” and it fails to account for the obvious fact that the current generation of officials grew up in a UFO-saturated media environment, so of course they have interest in them and speculate about them, just like nearly half of the older adults in their age bracket. 
​The biggest news in the article is that the Trump Administration now has a plan for how to handle the news of extraterrestrial intelligence should it be confirmed—which, no one in the article notes, implies that they have not confirmed any such thing.
 
The worst part of the article was the third-hand implication that Donald Trump knows that America has a secret cache of space alien technology and is just waiting for the right time to reveal it to the faithful. (Trump has repeatedly denied having knowledge of aliens, for whatever a congenital liar’s word is worth.) Read the sourcing on this claim carefully:
“The president knows more about it than people thinks [sic] he does,” said a UAP expert who has had discussions with people with direct knowledge of Trump’s concerns and was granted anonymity to describe those conversations. He noted that Trump himself seems to believe the government has evidence of non-human technology and wants the truth to come out: “It’s enough to leave him disturbed about what to do.”
​An anonymous “expert” who spoke with an unnamed person who has “knowledge” of Trump’s feelings, but no direct evidence. And the claim about Trump’s belief in an alien conspiracy is not attributed to the unnamed insider but rather to the UFO “expert’s” feelings about what Trump “seems” to think—again, contradicted by Trump’s own statements.
 
Now, since there is no such thing as a UFO expert, given that UFOs are by definition “unknown,” what we are really talking about is a very small group of interested UFO disclosure advocates who make their living from the subject. We have seen several of them make similar claims in recent months, but each time it turns out to be hype and hope masquerading as evidence. You can guess as well as I can which of the “experts” Politico talked to who wanted to poison the discourse with hype without having his name attached.
 
The remainder of the article is a profile of the UFO-mad scientists, including Loeb and Garry Nolan, who promiscuously veer from saying UFOs require investigation because the sightings are unknown (true, and uncontroversial, despite their assertions otherwise) to ranting about scientists and the media failing to take seriously that these must be alien spacecraft and interdimensional vessels (a complete fantasy with no evidentiary basis outside science fiction). They also offered some conspiracy theories about the CIA trying to stop the truth about aliens from being revealed, with Nolan calling it his “nemesis.” Loeb claims that other scientists are simply jealous of his genius, which has failed to find any meaningful evidence of aliens. Alexander Wendt, a professor hawking a new UFO book, wants a 50-year (!) news blackout to prepare humanity for the revelation of aliens, saying the revelation would lead to wars that would end civilization—again, presupposing secret evidence of aliens that no fuzzy blob caught on video has heretofore provided. (Never mind the presumption that we are in control of when and how the aliens reveal themselves.)
 
And that remains the problem: The current government-adjacent “UFO” research can’t decide whether it is a scientific inquiry into things seen in the sky that are by definition unknown or whether it is a transcendental adventure canvassing the known universe for evidence of an extraterrestrial intelligence. While the science fiction that forms the core of the UFO myth has done much to conflate the two, they are not the same, and lurching between them makes any government inquiry both suspect and ridiculous. You can’t go from “What is this blob caught on camera?” to “How will our imminent contact with the super-genius space squid from Zeta Reticuli impact our relationship to the divine?” without passing through some intermediate layers of evidence that, as of yet, have never been proven to exist.
 
Perhaps that is the whole reason for the effort to get the government to “reveal” that aliens are here and they have always known: to skip over the hard work of actually proving their assumptions—something eight decades of ufology has never accomplished—to get to the fun part where they get to be priests of the new alien faith.
[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
​Dan Farah, the filmmaker behind The Age of Disclosure documentary that took Washington by storm last year, has made good on his promise to acquire the rights to former UAP Task Force director Jay Stratton’s forthcoming UFO memoir Out of the Shadows in order to turn it into a drama series, Variety reports. Farah, who negotiated Stratton’s book deal with the TV deal as a sweetener, has secured the services of Sopranos writer Terrence Winter to enter intro preproduction on the series, which they claim will be political thriller mixed with a domestic drama centering on the impact on Stratton’s family life of his investigation into the government’s UFO coverup conspiracy. There is currently no pickup deal from any network or streamer, and it is unclear who might want an inferior version of The X-Files when the real thing is returning to television soon for its latest reboot. Stratton alleges that supernatural werewolf (almost certainly a black bear) began stalking his family after he spent time at Skinwalker Ranch. His memoir will be published on October 13.
[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
The team of researchers investigating the Turkish site of Durupınar for evidence that the boat-shaped geological formation is Noah's Ark told the Daily Mail that a recent scan has provided "100% confirmed" proof that the site is manmade and therefore the likely site of the Ark. Noah's Ark Scans conducted a new scan in June, and the results found what they claim are right angles inside the site and a significant presence of organic materials in excess of the surrounding ground, which they interpret as evidence that the formation is the petrified remains of Noah's wooden vessel. They also claimed to have found no rock inside the formation. Noah's Ark Scans founder Andrew Jones conceded, however, that none of the new evidence actually proved that the site was Noah's Ark. However, "I firmly believe the Durupınar Formation represents the buried remains of Noah's Ark," Jones said. The report in the Mail ​yesterday appears to be the same as the claim Noah's Ark Scans made last month, though Jones now says that they have begun core drilling to try to obtain samples of the buried Ark.
[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
As I continue to work on my book proposal, I only have time for a brief notice today: A new English-language documentary about to have is German premiere is going in search of Atlantis in one of the least likely spots: Scandinavia. If that sounds a little familiar, it's because it's based on early modern Swedish scholar Olof Rudbeck's eccentric theory, which had its heyday in the seventeenth century. Fortunately, it seems that the team behind the hour-long film, which is produced and directed by Bernhard Shirg, who teaches public history and has a PhD in Renaissance Latin, are more interested in the social history of how Europeans understood the far north than in finding Atlantis itself. The press release for the film describes it this way:
In the 1670s, the Swedish polymath Olof Rudbeck the Elder attempted to prove that the utopian places described in classical mythology were located in Scandinavia. Dr. Bernhard Schirg of the University of Hamburg followed in Rudbeck’s footsteps and traces his imaginary geography in his film “Frozen Atlantis – Seeking Wonder in Shifting Lands.”“Frozen Atlantis” is a cinematic essay produced as part of a “Freigeist” grant from the Volkswagen Foundation. In it, Renaissance scholar Bernhard Schirg sets out in search of the wondrous that people have found in their world throughout the ages—a poetic journey through the inner and outer landscapes of the 21st century that explores the human need for belonging, connection, and stories.

On his journey through Sweden’s mountains, rivers, and glaciers, Bernhard Schirg—guided by 17th-century books, maps, and panoramic sketches—follows in the footsteps of Olof Rudbeck the Elder (1630–1702). Over the course of three decades, Rudbeck had expanded his thesis and, in his monumental work *Atlantica*, asserted that all ancient myths originated in the North and that the cradle of civilization lay there.

Together with explorer Lars Larsson, Bernhard Schirg ventures into landscapes that Rudbeck claimed formed the basis for myths such as Atlantis and Elysium. His journey thus becomes a search for answers to the question of what perspectives these myths once anchored in the nature of the North.
​
Rudbeck’s holistic vision and narrative of the Swedish landscapes are contrasted with the transformative influence of humankind. Through its interventions in nature, humankind continually alters what Rudbeck once described as immutable. “Frozen Atlantis” raises the question of how the stories we tell shape our relationship to the world around us. Can myths—even in the post-truth era—inspire new perspectives—perspectives that move us?
According to the University of Hamburg, where Shirg teaches, he has been studying Rudbeck and his vision of Atlantis since 2021 and the documentary is a public-facing part of the Volkswagen Foundation-funded research.