[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
Actor Brandon Flynn will take on the role of James Dean in a new film exploring the rocky and sometimes romantic friendship between Dean and his best friend William Bast, according to the film’s director, Guy Guido. Willie and Jimmy Dean is based on Bast’s 2006 memoir, Surviving James Dean, a revision of his 1956 biography James Dean, in which Bast restored sections on Dean’s same-sex relationships and Bast’s own homosexuality that he self-censored in the first book.
Picture
Actor Brandon Flynn in a Calvin Klein campaign.
Guido and Flynn made the announcement earlier today in The Hollywood Reporter, but I’ve been aware of Flynn’s casting for some time. I wasn’t able to say anything until the public announcement. Recently, Guido asked me to send Flynn an autographed copy of my book, Jimmy: The Secret Life of James Dean, and I am excited that Guido and Flynn are using my book for background research into Dean’s life and character.
Picture
Bast’s “Surviving James Dean” and my “Jimmy”
The film “highlights how Hollywood has historically forced LGBTQ people into performance, even in their personal lives,” Flynn told The Hollywood Reporter. “This story dares to present James Dean as a man with real, complex relationships, and I think there’s power in that truth.”

This is, of course, the same thing that I tried to do in Jimmy, and I hope that the movie will help to bring a truer version of the story of James Dean to a broader audience.
Picture
Brandon Flynn as Justin Foley in “13 Reasons Why”
I am delighted that Flynn will be playing Dean. He is the actor I would have chosen for the role. He recently played Marlon Brando on stage, which would have delighted Dean to no end. His performance as “Justin Foley” in the Netflix series 13 Reasons Why is a nearly perfect dry run for Dean, and I remarked at the time that the character and Flynn’s performance, particularly in the early seasons, were an almost dead-on recreation of James Dean. Dean was probably a touch fierier and angrier than Justin, but the combination of bravado and vulnerability is the same.

Guido saw the same thing. As he told The Hollywood Reporter:

“It’s a tender and sometimes tragic story about two young men who found each other in a time and place where being seen — truly seen — came at a cost. Brandon Flynn brings both the fire and vulnerability this role demands. I couldn’t imagine anyone more perfect to explore and play out the complexities of James Dean.”

Tesla Takedown Tuesday

Jun. 24th, 2025 11:03 am
solarbird: (korra-on-the-air)
[personal profile] solarbird

Today is another Tuesday Tesla Takedown at the Lynnwood (Washington State) Tesla dealership.

4:15 PM • Tesla store – Lynnwood • 17731 Pacific Hwy, Lynnwood, WA 98037

There are several other protests, sign events, and so on today in other locations as well. You can pick your preference.

Tesla Takedown is an endurance run. Please show up to help demonstrate that going in with Trump has long-term consequences.

If you can’t show up today, you can find more actions on different days here.

Posted via Solarbird{y|z|yz}, Collected.

Bolted Production Update & Playtests

Jun. 24th, 2025 05:01 am
[syndicated profile] wondermark_feed

Posted by David Malki !

From a recent playtest!

Some quick updates on my Wondermark card game Bolted!

I’m working on getting this game finished and off to print, but there are still a few things to iron out.

Specifically: One big change that I’ve introduced is an extra mechanic that allows for additional strategic choice in the game.  If you don’t want to play a card onto your creature, you can instead “scrap” that card for a variety of different effects.

This opens up a new dimension of strategy and also allows for the creation of combos that can be really fun to pull off! I think it’s a great new wrinkle for the game.

It’s all pretty straightforward.

Join Virtual Playtesting With Me

I’m now doing more playtesting to confirm:

  • That the secondary effect options are interesting without being too overwhelming.
  • That the effects I’ve designed are fun, and affect the game flow positively.
  • That what you can do is clearly explained to players.

To get in more reps with the updated rules, I’m hosting more virtual playtesting this week:

Feel free to grab a slot at: picktime.com/wondermark

If you’ve played before, I’d love to have you back! If you’ve never played, I’d love to have you too!

Unsupervised Playtesting

Pretty soon, I’m going to be sending out the rulebook to folks to confirm it’s clear and understandable. Please feel free to sign up here if you want to be on that specific review list!

(If you’ve signed up for this earlier, I’ve still got your info and will be in touch soon enough.) 

Other Updates

  • I THOUGHT I was basically done with the art for this game, but then I unfortunately stumbled across thousands of additional vintage images. (As documented here.) This might necessitate some new additions.
  • I’m going into much more detail on the finer points of game updates and design over on my Discord. Feel free to pop in there to ask any questions or get into the nitty-gritty with me!
  • If you happen to be in Seattle, I’m also doing in-person playtesting most Wednesdays at the Playtest Northwest meetups. Drop me a line on Discord if you want to connect in-person at one of those.
  • I’m pretty excited about this game, friends!!
The end-game state of the creature first shown at the top of this update

[Comment on this post on Discord]

a day that will…

Jun. 22nd, 2025 07:48 am
solarbird: (korra-grar)
[personal profile] solarbird

December 7th, 1941: the Empire of Japan bombed Pearl Harbour. American President Franklin D. Roosevelt called it “a day that will live in infamy” in his famous speech to Congress asking for a declaration of war against Japan.

That particular epithet – that’s a strong one. And unlike most such epithets, it’s held up. People know it, still.

I mean, sure, slogans like “Remember the Maine!” rallied people at the time, but it’s an historical footnote; “Remember the Alamo!” has more weight, but not because of the attack – it’s because of the hopeless and romanticised defence.

(That it was, push comes to shove, in defence of slavery is important but not relevant to my line of thought here.)

Why was the Pearl Harbour attack somehow that much worse?

It wasn’t that Japan attacked a purely military target in a United States territory. Nothing wrong with that by the rules of war. Certainly nothing infamous about it, either. Within the rules of war, it’s fair play.

It’s not that it was a surprise, even – though it was, and that tends to be what people think of when they hear the phrase. Most people at the time assumed a Japanese Imperial attack would come in the Philippines, not in Hawai’i. But surprise attacks are the meat and gravy of war, and simply good strategy – again, not a source of infamy.

It wasn’t even, really, that they started the war with the attack. That’s kind of how wars tend to go. As a rule, one doesn’t go declare war and then stand around a while giving your enemy a week or two to get their defences in place.

So why were people who were absolutely expecting war – absolutely getting ready for a war – with Japan still so very angry about the way it started? What made a crowd certain that war was inevitable – a crowd that was getting ready for it, whether they liked it or not – go, “oh, that is too goddamn far”?

It was that Japan was literally still negotiating as the bombs fell.

Roosevelt mentions this in his speech to Congress asking for a declaration of war. It’s shallow in the specifics, but it’s explicitly there, in the first minute. He didn’t have to get into the weeds of details; everybody in Congress knew.

The Japanese attack started at 12:48pm Eastern time. The military finally got word sometime after 1:30pm Eastern time. The Japanese ambassador had scheduled a meeting with Secretary of State Hull for 1:45pm, and didn’t show up until 2:05pm, by which time the bombs had been falling for over an hour – and even then, they delivered a statement responding to a previous US position paper delivered on November 26th.

It was harsh, but it was no declaration of war.

The Japanese delegation were literally negotiating as their air force’s bombs fell.

That betrayal – that subterfuge, that backstab – coloured the entire rest of the war in the Pacific, up to and including the decision to use those atomic bombs.

Does that still-negotiating-as-the-bombers-let-fly trick sound like something that just happened this afternoon?

Maybe it should.

Japan’s plan was a quick but heavy knockout blow on a military target, to weaken American forces in the Pacific and force the Americans to accede to their demands in China.

Trump’s plan was apparently also a quick but heavy knockout blow on military targets, to force the Iranians to accede to Trump’s – and Netanyahu’s – demands in the Middle East.

Iran is in no way the 1940s US; Trump’s clown car criminal crowd is in no way the leadership of Imperial Japan. This is not World War II, and since Trump didn’t go nuclear, I don’t think it’s World War III; this is not that kind of projection, so don’t make it into one.

I’m just talking infamy. As far as infamy goes?

Yeah.

I could really see saying this is an act of infamy.

Obviously, that’s the kind of thing Iran would say, no matter what. Aside from that, times have changed. Asymmetrical war, disinformation, irregular warfare as a primary strategy – all those old ideas about war have rather gone by the way side. It’s hard to talk about something as infamous in war these days.

But still. I could see it.

And more importantly… I could see people believing it.

Couldn’t you?

Posted via Solarbird{y|z|yz}, Collected.

solarbird: (korra-on-the-air)
[personal profile] solarbird

…but here are some options from a foreign-policy standpoint as laid out by The Atlantic. Seems a reasonable summary to me.

What it completely leaves out is that this is a direct violation of the War Powers Act, the UN Charter (to which the US is signatory), and even the National Security Act. I guess that’s not important anymore.

Correctly, there are calls for impeachment tonight from outside and within Congress. I suggest you write whoever you’ve got up there to do the same. But I do not expect it to go anywhere; I am absolutely confident the MAGAts will find a way to justify their 100% spin on the “peace president” and why bombing Iran – an absolute act of war – is just fine and all the more reason to worship their shit-stain incarnate God Emperor.

I’ve got a short essay going up tomorrow morning at 7:48am. If you know why 7:48am on Sunday is an important time, you’ll probably have some idea what it’s about. You’re probably not completely right – but you’re quite certainly not really wrong, either.

For the rest of you?

It’s about infamy.

Posted via Solarbird{y|z|yz}, Collected.

In Brief: June UFO News Roundup

Jun. 19th, 2025 05:44 pm
[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
​In an interview with Mick West, a former AARO leader confirmed that in areas like Washington, D.C. that had sophisticated surveillance, there were no unidentified flying objects over the past twenty years—everything could be identified. It was only in areas with limited ability to track and detect objects that “unknown” things flew through the skies. In short, UFOs increasingly seem to be a product of limited information about what someone is really seeing.

​In Matt Laslo’s Ask a Pol newsletter today, he presents UFO-friendly Rep. Eric Burlinson’s reaction to the recent Wall Street Journal UFO exposé revealing that the Pentagon had systematically fed its own program leaders fake information about space aliens and recovered flying saucers. When Laslo asked him about it in an interview posted last week, Burlinson offered a shifting response:
“Well, you remember, like, that was my original worldview,” Rep. Eric Burlison exclusively tells Ask a Pol. “What he's saying is probably the case. I think it's the most likely scenario.”
 
Interesting. But that kind of seems at odds with your conversation with folks in the FBI’s UFO unit. Or do you think they’re all just siloed?
 
“Yeah, so I would say, I do think that the people that provided information for that article did not have a full picture of everything that's going on,” Burlison says. “They do not. There's no way they could. But at the end of the day, I think they don't have the full picture.”
​Burlinson appears to say two different things—that he agrees that most of the military UFO claims are the result of deception and mistakes and also that that those exposing the fake program don’t have the “full picture.” You can parse those sentiments in a number of ways to speculate about ways both could be true, but it sure sounds like Burlinson just shifts his language to sound like he’s agreeing with whatever someone says to him without actually committing to a position.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a conspiracy theorist, called the report bullshit” and told Laslo she would stick by her conspiracy theories, while Sen. Mike Rounds, another UFO enthusiast, told Laslo on Wednesday that the WSJ findings were “common knowledge.” This means that since he had never previously mentioned these findings, which he said were “not secret,” he had himself therefore personally chosen to hide the truth from the public while publicly stoking UFO conspiracies. 
[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
​You wouldn’t know it from a Popular Science article deploying the familiar “archaeologists remain baffled” trope, but a recent analysis of a carved stone found in the Canadian wilderness in 2018 helps to bolster the case that the Kensington Runestone was part of a broader nineteenth-century trend of fake inscriptions. 
Picture
Researcher study the rune stone. (Ryan Primrose / Ontario Centre for Archaeological Education)
​Deep in the woods, nearly 500 miles northwest of Ottawa, sits a slab of stone on which the Lord’s Prayer and an image of a boat are carved in Furthark runes, the oldest type of rune. The stone slab only became visible when a tree fell, exposing where it had long been hidden beneath dirt and trees after it was deliberately buried long ago.
 
An interdisciplinary team that included Henrik Williams—the Uppsala University runologist readers with a long memory will remember from his long-ago critiques of Scott Wolter—examined the runes and kept quiet for several years as analysis progressed to prevent incomplete or incorrect information from leaking.
 
"We didn't want to release information publicly until we had done as much as we could at the time to understand exactly what it was," archaeologist Ryan Primrose told the CBC.
 
The team determined that the runes were most likely carved by a Swedish member of the Hudson’s Bay Company in the early to middle nineteenth century, and the text—the Lord’s Prayer in Swedish—was copied from a version published in the later nineteenth century, derived from a 1611 original version. The text used a form of Furthark runes developed by Johannes Bureus in the 1600s, which Bureus had adapted for Swedish. (The original use of the alphabet in from the first millennium was not deciphered until 1865.) The team speculates that the stone may have been meant for a worship site for Swedish workers.
 
The discovery is especially important because it provides direct evidence that Swedish-speaking immigrants carved runestones during the nineteenth century and deliberately buried them. This is exactly what skeptics have long believed was the origin of the Kensington Runestone. If the dating of the Canadian stone is correct, the carving of rune stones dates back half a century or more before the Kensington Runestone’s “discovery,” and coincides closely with the period in the 1830s and 1840s when Carl Christian Rafn set off a craze for Scandinavian history when he claimed in Antiquitates Amercanae (1831) that the Norse had colonized North America.

hey team north end!

Jun. 17th, 2025 02:54 pm
solarbird: (korra-on-the-air)
[personal profile] solarbird

Today’s Tuesday. There’s a Tuesday protest, Lynnwood, Tesla dealership on 99. 4:15pm TODAY, like usual. As I’m writing, that’s literally an hour and like 20 minutes away.

Yeah I kinda forgot too lol, but no reprieves for the fascist.

Let’s get out there~~~

Posted via Solarbird{y|z|yz}, Collected.

Wondermark on Discord & Instagram

Jun. 17th, 2025 07:06 pm
[syndicated profile] wondermark_feed

Posted by David Malki !

I have a Discord server for Wondermark (and the other things I get up to)!

[ Wondermark on Discord ]

This has existed for a while, but it’s been pretty quiet for most of its existence.

Now, though, I’ve set up some new channels and am spending more time in there!

I’m excited to do more casual chatting and sharing with fellow lovers of the curious and creative. Participating more in smaller communities is feeling increasingly important to me.

Recently I’ve been answering questions about my card game Bolted as well as admiring a lovely photo someone posted of a pregnant hedgehog.

Come share pictures of good animals and tell me about what you’re enjoying reading, making, doing these days! Those recommendations are always welcome.

image

I’ve also started re-running the entire Wondermark archive on Instagram:

[ Wondermark on Instagram ]

It’s a bit of a strange feeling, posting 22-year-old work to an audience that may be seeing it for the first time.

I’ve chopped up the old comics in such a way that they are nearly impossible to read on a desktop browser, but swipe very satisfyingly on phones, which is how the vast majority of people use IG, I figure.

Hooray, now you have some links to click on! Or tap, if you are on your phone. Either interface option works; that is the promise of technology!

[syndicated profile] colavito_feed
​Last week, I wrote a bit about the origins of the name of the first pharaoh in medieval Arabic traditions, Naqrāūs. Well, that led me to the first pharaoh in the Greek tradition, which is a bit of a confusing mess. Herodotus, of course, famously named the first (human) king of Egypt as Menes, but in later Greek traditions, from roughly the fourth century BCE onward, the story changed and Sesostris took that position, establishing a kingship in Egypt after the first king in history, Ninus, did the same in Assyria. Sesostris, in the Greek tradition, was a world-conquering hero whose dominion stretched from Europe to Scythia and whose power was unrivaled. 
I ended up here in a rather roundabout way, through the fifth-century work of Orosius, a Christian historian whose Seven Books of History Against the Pagans, which survives in the original, was also quoted by the Arabic-language historian al-Maqrizi around 1400 CE. When al-Maqrizi quoted Book 1, chapter 14, he gave the name of the ancient king as Berūbah. When I went back to Orosius’ original, I discovered the name given as “Vesozes.”
 
I have no idea how the Arabic translator whose work al-Maqrizi copied (he states explicitly that he is using a translation) got from Vesozes to Berūbah. But I did discover that Orosius apparently got his name from Justin, whose Epitome of the work of Pompeius Trogus gives the same figure’s name as Vezosis. This, everyone agrees, is supposed to be Sesostris.
 
All of the references in the literature suggest that there is some body of common knowledge of how this mangling of names happened, but no one will say what it is. The closest any source came was to give page numbers to a French-language article by Gaston Maspero from 1901 in which he reviews a German-language book, Sesostris, by Kurt Sethe, which apparently attempted trace the etymology of various forms of the king’s name. I don’t have access to the book, so a translation of Maspero’s summary will need to suffice:
In 1867, [Georg] Unger adopted the thesis of these scholars, and he attempted to prove its accuracy by carefully comparing all Greco-Roman texts with all known Egyptian documents at the time. He observed that classical tradition traced its hero further back than the Ramesside line. He came to believe that Osirtasen III was the successor whom this tradition attributed to its Sesostris—Sesostris, Marachos, Narachos, Nakkaros, Nencoreus. He showed that most of the features of the legend were also visible in the kings of the Twelfth and Twenty-Eighth Dynasties, and he concluded that Sesostris really belonged to the Twelfth Dynasty, just as Manetho had asserted: he was Osirtasen or, as pronounced according to Lauth, Vesourtesen III. Sesostris would have been a popular corruption of Vesourtesen, but by derivation of the second part Sen from the official form; the first part responding, as Eratosthenes had it, to an Egyptian term meaning "powerful, vigorous": Ses-Sis, perhaps an abbreviation of the name of the god Khonsu, Schonsou, Epupis or Psamphis. Unger henceforth had no doubt that Manetho had indeed meant a Sesostris from the XIIth Dynasty; most Egyptologists continued nonetheless to believe that the hero of Herodotus had been modeled primarily, if not uniquely, on Ramses II of the monuments.
 
Mr. Sethe has just revisited the question and added a new point. The most important fact, he says, is that all readings of the name transcribed until now as Osirtasen, Osortesen, Vesourtesen—all consist first of the name of a goddess, Ousret–Ousret, later followed by the feminine termination –t, Ousreté, the powerful one; and second, an element SEN, possibly from the root snj, to resemble, to be equal to…, which appears in many theophoric names under the first Theban empire: Sn-t-Imn, the one who is equal to Amon, Sn-t-Bȝ, the one who is equal to the Ram of Mendes, Sn-t-Mȝᶜ.t, the one who is equal to the goddess Maat.
 
The name of the goddess, written at the beginning of the word, does not take second place in pronunciation, due to the principle of honor usually applied in such cases: hence one wrote Ousresen but said Sen-Ousret, then Sen-wosret, she who is equal to the goddess Wosre. Σεσωστρις is therefore not much further from Sen-wosre than most good transcriptions of Egyptian names are from their original Egyptian forms. “S” for the auxiliary vowel in the middle of words, long “e” for the short “o” in an open syllable, “e” for “a” in the feminine ending –at, the final “ou” in Greek instead of Egyptian “w” are all fully regular. Elsewhere we find the Greek combination σε for an Egyptian or Semitic “w”: especially when it is placed at the beginning, as in this case, which is nothing but natural. … There is no real difference between Senwosret and Sesostris than that of the second part, corresponding to w and t in Egyptian.
 
Mr. Sethe supposes that the name fell into the hands of those who themselves misunderstood it and transformed it—as did Ausone, in the form Sesostris; to avoid the hiatus resulting from the fall of an n in Se(n)ostris–Sostris, an extra s was inserted between o and t, and one arrived at Sesostris, Sesostris, and then Sésostris, Sésostris. The versions without t or n, Sésosis–Sésosis, derived from a misunderstood Egyptian model where the root wsr, strong, powerful, would have been kept and perhaps even reinforced; as is often the case in other names: Senwosre–Senwosre would have gradually changed into Sewose, then into Sesose, Sésostris and Sésostros.
 
Since the first century, the name Sesostris has most often been attached to the heroes named Sesosis, Sesostris, Sesonchosis, Sesou, and Sesetsourai, all supposedly drawn from the Ramesside name (like Rameses I, II, or III). Mr. Sethe rejects this etymology and substitutes the one he just explained. This is the core of his study. When it comes to laying out the dates, wars, reforms, all the historical material attributed to Sesostris by classical authors, the facts better match what we know of the Pharaohs of the Twelfth Dynasty and especially of Osirtasen I than the “history of Ramses,” which is supported only by indirect testimonies collected by Bunsen and, more recently, by Wiedemann. If we add to that what we owe to Sethe’s analysis, it is all the hypotheses that attributed to Ramses II the portions of the Sesostris legend that Unger thought he could attribute to another.
​This, apparently, is the underlying scholarly analysis that is now conventional wisdom about the origins of the name Sesostris.
 
That didn’t really help, unless the argument is that Trogus ignored Greek tradition and rendered the name from a transliteration of a partly understood hieroglyphic original, Vesourtesen. That’s possible, but probably not the answer, not least because Trogus’ sources were Greek, not Egyptian.
 
In checking into Justin’s Epitome, it seems that there are two hundred ancient and medieval copies of it, and “Vezosis” is only one variant. According to an 1898 article by the German scholar Fritz Hommel, the same name is given as “Vexoris,” “Uesosis,” and “Sesosis” in other manuscripts. It might have saved me quite a bit of time if anyone had just said that it was most likely a gradual scribal corruption by copyists who didn’t realize he was talking about Sesostris rather than scholars being super coy about it and giving long lists of references that refer to one another and ultimately go nowhere.

Let’s talk “Remigration”

Jun. 16th, 2025 09:15 am
solarbird: (korra-on-the-air)
[personal profile] solarbird

Farty McShitgibbon squirted out another racist authoritarian shart on Pravda Sotsialnaya late Sunday night, blowing off steam caused by his frustration at protests and over his shitty birthday parade. It’s a screed of lies about Democrats being sick in the head and not actually Americans, sending more waves of cops and military at us, and about cheering on mass deportations. Like y’do, if you’re a fascist fuckhead.

But let’s pay particular attention to this bit:

…I have directed my entire Administration to put every resource possible behind this effort, and reverse the tide of Mass Destruction Migration that has turned once Idyllic Towns into scenes of Third World Dystopia. Our Federal Government will continue to be focused on the REMIGRATION of Aliens to the places from where they came…

CAPS as in the original. Bold added.

Remigration pretends to be but is not actually a subtle word.

Remigration means ethnic purge. Ethnic cleansing, if you insist – but I hate that term, because there’s nothing cleansing about it. It’s an ethnic purge. It’s violent, it’s bloody, it’s repression, it’s expulsion at the point of a gun, based on your ethnicity.

Remigration means ancestry-based expulsions of people who aren’t white, for being not white, and not for any other reason. Just for being not white. Legal status means nothing; being a citizen means nothing. Not white? Get the fuck out, at gunpoint. That’s how it went during Operation W*tback; that’s how he wants it to go again, and now he’s just saying it.

This is not a question; this is not up for debate. If you feel like debating it with me, screw you you fascist-apologist fuck, and sit the fuck down. In this context – in any context outside academia – that’s what it means. Go read Wikipedia if you want the definition and history.

“Remigration” in this context absolutely and only means ethnic purge. All the leading haters in his administration – Miller, I’m looking in your direction – know damn well what it means. They used the word on purpose.

So I’m asking you not to discuss this shart of a statement without going directly to what REMIGRATION means. Do not let anyone lie and pretend it means something else, because that’s bullshit. Remigration is why they’re revoking every legal status they can; remigration is why they’re trying to end birthright citizenship; remigration means a violent ethnic purge.

And that’s what he’s told ICE – or more generally, “ICE, FBI, DEA, ATF, the Patriots at Pentagon and the State Department” – to make happen.

So. What do we do, in particular, right now?

First off, make sure people know what this word means.

Second – know any “good cops”? Like, relatives or something you might actually be able to reach? Show them the Wikipedia article about what “remigration” means, and only then show them Trump’s statement. Make sure they understand what Trump said, and make sure they know what they’re being asked to do. Make them understand, like… now.

Make sure they understand the criminal act they’re being asked to perform.

Because that is, absolutely, the ask, and “just following orders” … just won’t do.

Posted via Solarbird{y|z|yz}, Collected.

A word you need to know right now

Jun. 15th, 2025 10:45 pm
solarbird: (korra-on-the-air)
[personal profile] solarbird

I’ve got a post going up tomorrow (Monday) morning, but the word you need to understand right now is:

Remigration

If you don’t already know this word – or if you’re in certain areas of academia and think you do, but do not in any context outside academia – you need to know what this word means right now. And you need to make sure your friends know what it means.

Wikipedia will explain it to you.

More tomorrow.

Posted via Solarbird{y|z|yz}, Collected.

September 2023

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
101112 13141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags